Washington Votes

2007 Senate Bill 5648 (Providing sales and use tax exemptions for prescribed durable medical equipment used in the home and prescribed mobility enhancing equipment.)

[Comments on this legislation] [Text and Analysis] [Add to Watch List]
[Previous] [Next]

  • Introduced by Sen. Dan Swecker, (R-Rochester) on January 26, 2007, to exempt sales and use tax from applying toward certain prescribed durable medical equipment. Among others, the equipment includes components of prosthetic devices, Gaseous or liquid bottled oxygen, or mobility enhancing equipment. The bill requires the seller to collect the tax but the buyer may petition the State for reimbursement. See companion HB 1324.
    • Referred to the Senate Health & Long-Term Care Committee on January 26, 2007.
      • Substitute offered to the Senate Health & Long-Term Care Committee on February 21, 2007, to make technical corrections to include language already recognized by the Department of Revenue for durable medical equipment. Tax exemptions for nebulizers and their component parts are provided for in the form of a refund.
    • Referred to the Senate Ways & Means Committee on February 21, 2007.

Line

Comments

Introduced by Sen. Dan Swecker, (R-Rochester) on January 26, 2007. New Comment

1) Nebulizers [by Anonymous Citizen on October 2, 2008]
Okay. Could we please be clear here? If a patient is provided a nebulizer and their insurance is billed for it, is it taxed? Who is responsible for paying the tax? What about rentals of them? Or is it taxed only if sold directly to the patient. Granted in each case, the patient has a prescription and it is for home use. I just dont understand!!
Reply New Comment

Line

2) Senate Bill 5648 [by Anonymous Citizen on January 29, 2007]
The intent of this bill is fine, but the process is ridiculous. How much will it cost the State to process the refund requests?? "I am afraid we have become more enamoured with the process than the result."
Reply New Comment

Line



Capitol Building

Search legislation: